Funny sentences are not added to the ranking rating almost / Google revealed
In order to increase the ranking by Google, we need to evaluate linked and content to Google. However, when the sentence was too "funny sentences", Google knew that it would not appreciate that sentence too much.
"Read it aloud and say something is wrong," Google
It is Mr. Gary Irises of Google analyst who revealed this.
Is it okay if it is not a word salad?
It is said that unnatural sentences are hard to be added to the ranking evaluation, but people listening to such a thing, especially those who are not good at writing sentences say, "Are my sites properly evaluated? · · · "It may be uneasy.
However, perhaps, unless it is obviously a spam sentence (so-called word salad) generated programatically, it seems to be rare that it will not be added to the evaluation so far.
The word salad is as follows.
Even if it is not incoherent text so far, even if the sentence is not good a bit, it will not be underestimated.
That is because we have already experimented with our company.
Our experiment contents and result
We conduct a wide variety of SEO experiments and use it for service development and improvement.
Among them, there are things that aim for search high-ranking display on a page like "It seems that the content of the sentence is understood and satisfied by the search users, but if you look closely it is funny grammar".
As a result, I know that even if the grammar is a little bit messy, even rough contents are attractive and if you think that the viewing user is interesting, even a very competitive search keyword can be posted at the top .
Let's compete with content without worrying about the details
Therefore, when writing content for SEO, it can be said that grammar, how beautiful sentences are, whether the story is composed completely without collapse, such points may not be so important.
To put it more, if you let one of your customers actually read, if the meaning seems to be clear, that would be fine.
Instead, you need to be concerned about what "content" is to be evaluated by search users, and thus Google.
No comments:
Post a Comment